Arts and CultureSan Francisco

An Open Letter to City Hall in Support of the Bike Yield Law

Sign up for the best newsletter EVER!

san-francisco-cyclists

Dear Mayor Lee and the Board of Supervisors,

We ride bikes in San Francisco as our main form of transportation, and we write to you as constituents who care about making San Francisco a livable city for everyone. This is why we support the Bike Yield Law proposed by Supervisor John Avalos, and we hope you will, too.

We agree with you — nothing should jeopardize the safety of anyone on our streets. To achieve safer streets, we need to ticket cyclists who demonstrate dangerous behavior. We think everyone agrees that behaviors like blowing through stop signs without looking, cutting off pedestrians, and running red lights are extremely dangerous. However, slowly rolling through an intersection after safely yielding the right of way to pedestrians and other individuals present is simply not a dangerous action.

The Bike Yield Law helps by clarifying that cyclists must always yield to pedestrians and other individuals with the right of way. This law would allow the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) to focus their limited resources on giving citations to cyclists who commit violations that actually put people in danger. It will also allow the SFPD to concentrate on intersections and streets that the San Francisco Municipal Transit Authority has found to be the most dangerous, like Octavia and Market. If the SFPD is encouraged to focus on the five most dangerous traffic behaviors then we can actually achieve Vision Zero.

This law also would address the ongoing police crackdown on cyclists rolling through stops signs in areas like The Wiggle, which is one of the most used bicycle routes in the entire city. We believe the Wiggle crackdown unfairly targets cyclists because it is based on anecdotal neighborhood complaints, and not based on the data which shows that The Wiggle is not part of a high injury corridor. The SFPD applies a double standard when they target cyclists rolling through stop signs safely without a similar crackdown against motorists who exhibit the same behavior in the same intersections every day. The Bike Yield Law would eliminate this double standard by discouraging the SFPD from ticketing easy targets like slow moving cyclists in favor of the more important task of ticketing truly dangerous traffic behaviors.

san-francisco-bike-yeild-law

image from kqed

SFPD’s ongoing crackdown on cyclists also discourages people from using a bike for transportation. In a city dominated by cars, we believe it’s time to prioritize safer, slower transportation. When 24 pedestrians and 5 cyclists were killed on San Francisco streets in 2015 alone, we are clearly still not addressing the real problem. The problem is not cyclists rolling safely through stop signs at empty intersections. If we want safer streets, we simply need to enforce slower speeds and recommit to our goal of a multi-modal city.

On the heels of the COP21 agreement, we need to move beyond the criminalization of cycling, and instead encourage cycling as a normal mode of transportation for everyone. In 2010, the Mayor signed legislation presented by the Board of Supervisors making it official city policy to increase bicycle mode share to 20% of all trips by 2020. The Bike Yield Law would help San Francisco to achieve this goal, while reducing carbon emissions and traffic congestion.

Furthermore, the Bike Yield Law has international precedent. After demonstrating that a bike yield law actually resulted in a decrease in the number of collisions between bikes and cars in cities like Bordeaux, Nantes and Strasbourg, France amended its national vehicle code to allow all cities to adopt this policy. Paris adopted a bike yield policy in 2015 and it averages between three to five cyclist deaths per year, despite being almost three times as dense as San Francisco. For 30 years, Idaho has proved for San Francisco what the Bordeaux, Nantes and Strasbourg trials proved for Paris: that the Bike Yield Law is safe and effective.

The Bike Yield Law is a win-win for San Francisco. It will help the City achieve Vision Zero by redirecting the SFPD’s efforts to the most dangerous intersections, and also achieve its transit mode and climate change goals. Passing the Bike Yield Law in 2016 would make San Francisco a global leader in visionary, innovative urban transportation and climate policy.

We, the undersigned, urge you to pass the Bike Yield Law. Please join us in paving the way for San Francisco to become the most livable city in the United States of America.

Thank you,

Anonymous Constituent, District 10
Mary Kay Chin, District 6
Reed Martin, District 8
Melyssa Mendoza, District 5
Kristin Tieche, District 1
Amy Farah Weiss, District 3
Nathan Woody, District 1

Like this article? Make sure to sign up for our mailing list so you never miss a goddamn thing!
Previous post

Dub Mission Moves To Friday, Starting Tonight With Jahdan Blakkamoore

Next post

Children's After School Arts, featured in This American Life, on Display @ SOMArts


Broke-Ass Stuart - Editor In Cheap

Broke-Ass Stuart - Editor In Cheap

I've been called "an Underground legend": SF Chronicle , "an SF cult hero": SF Bay Guardian, and "the chief of cheap": Time Out New York, but to those familiar with my work, I'm just "that douchebag who writes books about cheap stuff and drinks a lot".

4 Comments

  1. CU
    January 8, 2016 at 11:15 am

    Great letter! Its time for sane enforcement from SFPD. Crackdowns on the wiggle are literally the opposite of what needs to happen if the city is serious about Vision Zero. Unfortunately, time and time again SFPD shows us just how lazy they truly are and how much they hate bicyclists. I thought SF was progressive but boy was I wrong!

    • Kristin Tieche
      January 8, 2016 at 10:00 pm

      Thx, CU. Not much time left before the vote. You may want to write your supervisor and/or the mayor to tell him/her to support the bike yield law. You can quote from this letter.

  2. BarryEisenberg
    January 9, 2016 at 10:45 am

    Unfortunately Peskin cannot be swayed to veto Lee’s veto. I bent his ear good at a party but his final answer was that since he is up for reelection in less than a year and that voters in his district are not particularly pro-bicyclist he is not going to reverse his original vote on the Idaho stop. Officially he is against it as just another “feel-good” measure from Avalos. Even if he were to reverse, you’d also need Norman Yee and his vote to ovrturn would be dubious. So let us continue doing what 99% of bicyclists already do, while keeping an eye out for coppers sicced on us by that asshole Captain of the Park Station, who blows hot and cold on the matter depending on who’s listening. Is there any doubt he is angling for higher office and using his station’s blotter as a bully pulpit? Don’t you just love politically ambitious cops? I could name others.

    • Kristin Tieche
      January 9, 2016 at 4:51 pm

      I think we can do better than just doing what we always do. Spending the rest of my afternoon emailing all the other supes. We have to pass the bike yield law!