Why We Need To Restructure The Supreme Court
Written by: Habibi Bridges and Abraham Woodliff
Are we seriously doing this again?
On what would be the largest setback in gender rights in decades, a leak via Politico on Monday revealed the Supreme Court’s draft decision overturning Roe v Wade, a landmark decision on gender and reproductive rights handed down nearly half a century ago. Some may see this as a long time coming considering the current Supreme Court roster and their political leaning
Protestors have already gathered outside the Supreme Court in DC as of Tuesday morning to protest this preliminary decision, as lawmakers brace for impact. Anti-abortion supporters have gathered as well. President Biden, who supports abortion rights, has announced a reminder to Americans that the final decision has yet to be published, and the preliminary decision could look different by the time it is due to be released this summer.
As millions of women around the country face life changing legal implications of this approaching Supreme Court decision, some politicians around the country have expressed delight over the alleged decision. Others, like California Governor Gavin Newsom, have promised to “fight like hell” to ensure abortion rights to women living in their state. Some officials in California are already taking steps to protect abortion, and some lawmakers have even proposed to draft abortion rights into the California state constitution.
My question is: why the fuck is there an institution in this country that is filled with unelected representatives who can just decide to interpret the right to abortion as unconstitutional?
Interestingly, according to polls, the majority of Americans support Roe v Wade–however, this doesn’t generally reflect the political affiliations of the politicians representing us in office.
Businesses and corporations are also expected to take a political stance; some already have in states that have been dealing with stricter abortion bans, such as Texas. Companies such as Yelp, Citigroup, and Amazon have pledged to assist employees in abortion access including travel and medical fees.
Senator Mitch McConnell has publicized his outrage over the leak, while avoiding giving his reaction to the alleged SCOTUS decision, and has proposed that an investigation must take place into how the preliminary decision to reverse Roe v Wade was leaked to the public in the first place.
My question is: why the fuck is there an institution in this country that is filled with unelected representatives who can just decide to interpret the right to abortion as unconstitutional?
While I understand that the judicial branch of the federal government is necessary, and constitutional law shouldn’t be altered as flippantly as leaders are elected, we need there to be more public oversight into how the court functions. The Democratic Party has proposed plans to expand the Supreme Court from 9 to 13 judges. While this is a step in the right direction, this won’t address the primary issue with the Supreme Court.
Politicians who are directly backed by corporate money are the ones selecting the judges rather than the people. The idea is that we the people vote in politicians that reflect our interests. These people, who are working for our benefit will vote in a way reflective of that. This isn’t the case at all as lobbyists and corporate donors dictate who gets in office. As long as that is the system at hand, the amount of judges is largely irrelevant.
I think the Supreme Court should have a term limit. I also think the people should elect who goes before Congress for a seat, and then Congress deliberates. At least that way we have some oversight as to who is interpreting law and setting legal precedent.
The majority of Americans support Roe v Wade, despite this, it will likely be kicked down to the states, and if Donald Trump is reelected in 2024, which appears possible, then the federal government is in a position to assist conservative governors to completely strip women of their reproductive autonomy.
This elimination of rights would ultimately benefit the rich, which always seems to be the case.
In my opinion, this issue isn’t about states’ rights or religious belief, but economics. There have even been articles asking if Millennials aren’t drowning in Student Debt who will fight the wars? Not to mention that workers are looked at as a resource to be exploited, if there is a scarcity of them, the worker class ultimately has more power, but if the nation is flooded with impoverished people pumping out children, America is in great position to feed the poor to the war machine and underpay the blue collar workers.
Everything, including reproductive freedom, is about money.
We lack healthcare, we’re poorly educated compared to other industrialized nations and the gap between the rich and the poor is worse than it was in France during the French Revolution. There is a ripple effect to every decision, and this, if allowed to occur, it will set America back and we’re already so far behind.
Can we just not?
FOLLOW MY WRITING ON INSTAGRAM HERE
FOLLOW BAY AREA MEMES ON FACEBOOK HERE
FOLLOW BAY AREA MEMES ON INSTAGRAM HERE
PURCHASE MY BOOK HERE
You Might Also Like
