Why Angry Young Men Are As Big A Threat As Guns

Updated: Jun 16, 2022 11:22
The Bay's best newsletter for underground events & news

Photo of Uvalde, Texas on a map.

Written By Habibi Bridges:

The rise in active shooting incidents in recent years, only to be magnified by last month’s Uvalde and Buffalo shootings, have once again brought the gun control debate to a head. The Uvalde shooting in particular, portrayed a common “school shooter” trope – a young, friendless, loner with anger issues who dropped out of high school and purchased a firearm shortly after turning 18. 

Salvador Ramos, 18, legally purchased two assault rifles for his birthday, along with 375 rounds of ammunition from a federally licensed local arms dealer with no trouble whatsoever.

Salvador Ramos, 18, legally purchased two assault rifles for his birthday, along with 375 rounds of ammunition from a federally licensed local arms dealer with no trouble whatsoever. Days later, he stormed into Robb elementary wearing a tactical vest, barricading himself in classrooms and began emptying his assault rifles on schoolchildren. 

We need to stop avoiding a larger problem– the fear of addressing those who are most likely to turn to violence: men.

“Why?” People asked, after the news broke out across the country. How anyone could callously destroy the lives of the innocent is unfathomable. The real question we should be focused on as a country  is “how could this be allowed to happen, time and time again?” This conversation is not only about gun control, but about mental health intervention, and how our system fails to protect citizens from those like Ramos and prevent young males from turning to violence in their youth.

We need to stop avoiding a larger problem– the fear of addressing those who are most likely to turn to violence: men. Young men within the ages of 16-21 are far more likely to commit violence than any other group, and not much has been done to prevent this. Surging androgens, linked to aggression, coupled with an undeveloped adolescent brain in a culture where toxic masculinity is still the norm is a problematic cocktail, especially when it has easy access to guns.

Early intervention with young, disenfranchised, mentally unstable and aggressive males should be a much higher priority in schools. Many of us are fully aware of the ‘school shooter’ or ‘mass shooter,’ stereotype. But how many of us take action when we come across a problematic boy who needs to be monitored, socialized, and guided by a responsible adult? Do we prioritize allocating resources to help combat antisocial behavior among young men? Or do we ignore the problem and hope that they grow out of it?

Regardless of the type of violence, gun violence or otherwise,  this is a vulnerable age group and as a country we are becoming increasingly more aware of mental health struggles that only worsen over time if not taken seriously. Schools need sufficient staffing, including counselors and behavior analysts, who identify problematic behaviors amongst children, especially aggression and antisocial characteristics amongst young males–and these males should be monitored and provided proper attention so that they don’t turn their angst into violence.

The government bureau which is tasked with regulating the weapons industry has been historically underfunded and unsupported by Congress, leaving gun manufacturers the ability to exacerbate gun violence with little to no accountability.

As schools have faced numerous budget cuts over the years, weapon manufacturers have been offered 

In the case of the Uvalde shooting, there were signs – several of which should have been addressed long before the shooting. Few, if any friends. High school dropout. Interest in firearms and weapons. He had a history of sending threats to kidnap, rape and kill girls he met online. The girls he messaged online, when questioned, rarely reported him–and when he was reported, nothing came of it. His threats were too vague, and all too common, as threats towards women are commonplace on the web.

That’s indicative of a larger problem–a problem of worsening mental health, exacerbated by a mediocre economy and a worldwide pandemic, coupled with stigma and shame amongst young men in a country that values profit off weaponry, death and destruction before people. With more guns than people and easy access to firearms, the likelihood that some of these young men turn to gun violence seems all too likely.

This is not to say that some amount of gun control legislation shouldn’t be passed. Guns are made for a sole purpose, and that is to maim and/or kill. With that in mind, it seems odd that a young person can purchase a killing machine before they are allowed to drink alcohol or rent a car – things of which are more relevant and essential to everyday life. When analyzing crime data and focusing on which demographic groups have the highest likelihood of perpetuating violence, let alone gun violence, it seems like the most vulnerable demographic is young males between the ages of 16-21.

Keeping that in mind, perhaps raising the age for purchasing guns would help curb some of the violence. However, this is not a fix-all solution, but just a part in a larger plan to remediate violence.

Like this article? Make sure to sign up for our mailing list so you never miss a goddamn thing!
Previous post

The Secret Garden Showcases the Next Generation of Circus Stars

Next post

What The Recall Of Chesa Boudin Reveals About San Francisco

Guest Writer

Guest Writer

We write for busboys, poets, social workers, students, artists, musicians, magicians, mathematicians, maniacs, yodelers and everyone else out there who wants to enjoy life not as a rich person, but as a real person. Namely, we write for you.

We’re currently looking to expand our author pool. If you’re snarky, know what’s happening in your town, and good at making your fingers type out funny words, then you might be just the person we’re looking for. Email with some writing samples if you're interested. Cheers


  1. Neha
    June 15, 2022 at 7:04 am — Reply

    Never thought about this side of the story, on how age itself is such a huge risk factor. Raising the age on guns seems like a great idea.

  2. dean
    June 16, 2022 at 3:57 pm — Reply

    yes, completely ignore the fact that virtually every mass shooter was raised in a fatherless home, because that of course leads to examining the effects of the welfare state and the sexual revolution -both “progressions” of the Left .
    In an open society and with the advantage of planning AROUND barriers-such as gun bans- almost any young man can go rent a heavy truck and simply mow people down or build improvised devices such as incendiaries or a truck bomb as used by ISIS killing 400 churchgoers in Sri Lanka( a place having already experienced decades of civil war killing tens of thousands, waged by Tamils who magically got full auto Kalashnikovs-not just semi autos- in spite of gun bans).
    Why stop there? Turn your country into a total police state, simply incarcerating all young men ,requiring a special permit to be allowed outdoors on their own to prevent any crime they may MIGHT commit (because MOTIVES).
    Yeah, THAT’LL make them less suicidal or angry, huh?

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.