ActivismNewsSan Francisco

Could a Housing Bill Fight Segregation in San Francisco?

The Bay's best newsletter for underground events & news

Senator Scott Wiener recently announced Senate Bill 827, which would enable denser housing construction around major transit stations and frequently used bus stops.

Most California communities limit the number of Californians who can live near public transportation through low-density zoning. SB 827 is a major blow to low-density zoning, which reinforces long-standing racial housing segregation while exacerbating displacement, income inequality, and hampering economic growth.

What is low-density zoning?

Until 1968, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) enforced an explicit policy of racial discrimination in mortgage lending. Under redlining, one black family was all it took for the FHA to demarcate a neighborhood as “undesirable” and refuse to guarantee loans for nearby houses. It incentivized homeowners to deed-restrict the sale of houses to white families only, creating all-white neighborhoods. White families sought to expel racial minorities in their neighborhoods by threatening black families with burning crosses.

The Fair Housing Act banned explicit racial discrimination in housing like race-based deed restrictions and redlining. But it did not ban density limits which resulted in race-based housing segregation.

White homeowners were still loathe to share their schools, parks, and roads with black families, so after the Fair Housing Act, cities around the country began implementing low-density zoning in order to ensure that black families could not afford to live in their communities. Race-based rules were replaced by land use regulations mandating single-family homes, minimum setbacks, minimum lot sizes, and parking requirements. For example, Milpitas banned apartment buildings after 250 black residents moved in to work at an auto manufacturing plant.

To see the impact of zoning on the racial distribution of a city, compare a map of San Francisco’s redlining map to its zoning laws to its current racial housing segregation.

Here’s a redlining map created by the Home Owners Loan Corporation in the late 1930s.

Source of the map here.

The New Deal agency authors described B15, in the Sunset, as a “Still Desirable” area to live.

“There are no racial concentrations, and the threat of infiltration of this character is remote.”

They labeled Forest Hill “Best,” and wrote that it was protected by deed restrictions ensuring that no homes could be sold to black families, and “zoning to single-family residences only.”

The current zoning map of San Francisco might not reference racial concentrations or threats of infiltration, but looks remarkably similar.

Source of the map here.

And they both bear a more-than-passing resemblance to a map of San Francisco’s racial housing segregation:

Source of the map here.

What you’ll notice is San Francisco has zoned the areas with the highest concentrations of white and Asian American residents for the lowest density.

Zoning also exacerbates income inequality among People of Color by geographically concentrating wealth and poverty. The median white homeowner’s house is worth $85,800 compared to $50,000 for black homeowners and $48,000 for Latino homeowners. That disparity mostly arises from the difference between home values in white neighborhoods versus non-white neighborhoods.

Beyond a net worth bolstered by housing price appreciation, a household’s location determines the quality of their transportation, job opportunities, health care, and educational opportunities. For example, The New York Times reports that increasing access to public transit is crucial to alleviating poverty.

“More than 20 years of research has implicated residential segregation in virtually every aspect of racial inequality, from higher unemployment rates for African Americans, to poorer health care, to elevated infant mortality rates and, most of all, to inferior schools,” writes 2017 MacArthur fellow Nikole Hannah-Jones.

Low-density zoning insulates wealthier neighborhoods from new construction. Luxury housing ends up displacing San Francisco’s long-time black and Latino residents because majority white and Asian neighborhoods aren’t zoned for apartments and condos.

Low-density restrictions also raises the cost of housing, and has played a part in San Francisco’s skyrocketing housing costs. The city is covered by vast swaths of land zoned for single-family homes with two-car garages. This leaves teachers, retail workers, first responders, and other middle-income professionals who can’t afford a single-family home facing two-and-a-half-hour commutes or living in their cars.

More density is the solution

SB 827 would help people of all income levels to be able live near transit. It promotes racial justice by preempting low-density “snob” zoning in wealthy suburbs with strong transit access.

t would also help ease the disproportionate burden for building currently on low-income POC communities by encouraging multi-unit construction in low-density wealthy white neighborhoods. Zoning for density makes building new homes in place of single-family homes more cost-effective replacing existing apartments.

The Boston Globe says SB 827 maybe “the greatest strike against inequality that anyone’s proposed in the United States in decades.”

Low-density zoning exacerbates racial housing segregation, displacement, and income inequality. It was developed for the purpose of exclusion, and it’s still having that effect today. Striking mandates requiring the land around transit be used only for single-family homes with large front yards and parking spots is just common-sense. But it also helps move San Francisco away from our history of race-based housing patterns and toward becoming a more equitable, inclusive city.

This post originally appeared at the Bay City Beacon. 

Like this article? Make sure to sign up for our mailing list so you never miss a goddamn thing!
Previous post

Only a Few Days Left to Get for Covered California!

Next post

6 San Francisco Natives That Did Big Things

Bougie-Ass Cathy

Bougie-Ass Cathy

Cathy Reisenwitz is a SF-based writer with a focus on sex, politics, and technology. She is Editor-in-Chief of Sex and the State.


  1. Sanfordia113
    January 26, 2018 at 4:46 pm

    What a blatant attempt by the real estate developer lobby to co-opt the social justice movement. So many fallacies in this propaganda piece.

    • Ɠ⊙иƶǾдҡĿдиɗ
      January 27, 2018 at 8:44 am

      ^ Scooby Doo land use politics.

  2. sfsquirrel
    January 27, 2018 at 9:55 am

    Cathy Reisenwitz is a darling of the right wing Libertarian, Koch-funded movement. Here’ what she has to say about Puerto Rico in her article for the Koch-backed think tank Foundation for Economic Education.

    1. Exempt Puerto Rico from federal minimum wage requirements

    The federally mandated minimum wage is equivalent to
    a $19 an hour minimum wage on the mainland. This is well above what
    even progressive economists believe a market can bear without hampering

    2. Reduce welfare benefits

    Combined welfare benefits actually exceed the $19 an hour (equivalent) minimum wage, discouraging work.

    3. Relax local labor laws

    Local overtime, paid vacation, and unemployment regulations are harder on Puerto Rico’s employers than the US mainland’s laws.

    4. Privatize

    Electricity in Puerto Rico is several times more expensive than on
    the mainland, in part because one state-owned, inefficient, overstaffed
    organization (PREPA) produces all power using outdated technology.

    Cato’s Richard W. Rahn says Puerto Rico should sell all of its interests in state-owned enterprises.

    5. Free the trade

    Being a small island, Puerto Rico needs to import a lot of goods.
    Krueger, et al support repealing their import tariffs, along with price
    floors and licensing requirements for ground transportation.

  3. Foginacan
    January 28, 2018 at 4:33 am

    It’s easier to discard families of color when you insist their homes never existed. Blame your ignorance on your newfound knowledge of Redlining. Sucks for Wiener and Trauss that our families and friends weren’t in Pennsylvania like theirs – we know our own history.

    Urban Renewal/Displacement denial isn’t pretty, Cathy Reisenwitz.